Chilmark Research March 25, 2020
John Moore

As the #COVID19 pandemic storms across the U.S., a thought I’ve been pondering is:

Will there be a measurable difference in ability to respond by those healthcare systems that have aggressively moved forward with adopting a population health management (PHM) strategy and supporting technology coupled with value-based care (VBC) models?

As mentioned in a previous post, in 2019 we did extensive research on how healthcare organizations (HCOs) were implementing a PHM strategy for VBC that culminated in a report released at year-end. Those HCOs implementing such a strategy for five years or more were, logically, far more sophisticated having migrated from a process-centric view of PHM/VBC to a strategic one including establishing a separate Population Health Service Organizations (PHSOs) to...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

Continue Reading

 
Topics: Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, Healthcare System, Patient / Consumer, Payment Models, Physician, Population Health Mgmt, Provider, Technology, Trends, Value Based
Related Articles:
Longitude Health launches population health company
Systems Thinking: The Future of Equitable, Efficient, and Effective Population Health Management
Growing Demand for Population Health Tools in Asia-Pacific Highlighted in the 2025 Black Book of Global Healthcare IT
Alzheimer Disease Treatment Can Improve Population Health and Health Equity
Designing and Evaluating Interventions that have a Measurable Impact on Population Health through Evidence-Based Practices and Research

Share This Article