RevCycle Intelligence October 3, 2017
Jacqueline Belliveau

With alternative payment models falling short of improving fee-for-service, a patient-centered payment system is needed, an industry expert suggested.

While alternative payment models, such as pay-for-performance, shared savings and risk, and bundled payments, were designed to improve the flawed fee-for-service system, the models are not addressing volume-based payment issues, according to a recent report from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform (CHQPR).

The organization’s President and CEO, Harold Miller, explained that healthcare payment reform efforts have either completely missed the mark or only partially addressed fee-for-service payment system flaws, including:

  • No assurance that healthcare services delivered are appropriate, high-quality, and achieve improved patient outcomes

Dig Deeper

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: ACO (Accountable Care), CMS, Employer, Health System / Hospital, MACRA, Medicaid, Medicare, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Physician, Population Health Mgmt, Primary care, Provider, RCM (Revenue Cycle Mgmt), Self-insured, Value Based
California ASCs fight payment cuts, staffing woes
The Perfect Storm facing the Healthcare Workforce: Eight Current Issues frame the Challenge
Improving patient care through technology and partnerships: Insights from Billings Clinic-Logan Health
Ballad Health's stabilizing physician practice model
What Does the Federal Government Spend on Health Care?

Share This Article