Forbes July 31, 2017
Chris Conover

In Part 1, we learned that real per capita health spending saw a 25-fold increase the 8 decades starting in 1929 even as real per capita GDP grew only 5-fold during the same period.

Whereas the previous post looked at cost trends in broad 20-year snapshots, today’s post looks at that extraordinary growth in health spending in much finer annual-level detail. Looking at real per growth has the advantage of removing general inflation so that we get a clearer picture of what’s going on, as well as telling us what is happening to the average U.S. resident.

With that in mind, I examined the difference in annual growth rates for real per capita health spending vs. all real non-health GDP...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), CMS, Congress / White House, Health System / Hospital, Healthcare System, HHS, Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Physician, Provider, Public Exchange, Self-insured
Why Are Hospitals So Expensive?
CareMax files for bankruptcy: 8 things to know
Lee Health to launch hospital-at-home program
Overweight, Obesity to Affect 64% of Americans by 2050
BCBS Massachusetts weight loss drug spend jumps 250%: 5 notes

Share This Article