Lexology January 7, 2020
Winston & Strawn LLP

In December 2019, the Firth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld, in a 2-1 decision, a lower court ruling that the individual mandate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) became unconstitutional when Congress set the penalty amount to zero as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, because the mandate was no longer a valid exercise of Congress’ taxing powers. However, the Appeals Court stopped short of throwing out the entire law and sent it back to the District Court of Texas to take another look at whether the individual mandate could be severed from other portions of the law. If you recall, this federal judge in Texas (Judge Reed O’Connor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), CMS, Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Provider, Public Exchange, Regulations
In Their Own Words Marketplace Enrollees Would Struggle to Afford Premium Hikes If Congress
Trump administration targets ACA 'program integrity' with new rule, slashes navigator funding
CMS cuts funding to ACA Navigator program
Eliminating the ACA Medicaid Expansion Match Could Reduce Total Medicaid Spending by Up To $1.9 Trillion Over 10 Years and End Coverage for 20 Million People
GOP calls for $1.5T in cuts, much of which could come from healthcare

Share This Article