IAPP June 8, 2023
Divya Sridhar

The state of Washington has led the way in creating the first set of guardrails (a geofence, some would say? pun intended) around consumer health data — which has now been followed by copycat laws such as the recently passed Connecticut Senate Bill 3 — to fill the void left by the landmark Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade.

Recent legislative and regulatory actions, including the Federal Trade Commission cases Premom, GoodRX and Flo, were particularly challenging because companies and consumers alike are required to read between the lines. For example, what do lawmakers and regulators mean when they suggest adopting robust protections for consumer health information?

Washington’s My Health My Data Act treats consumer health information as a...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: Digital Health, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Patient / Consumer, Privacy / Security, Provider, Regulations, States, Technology
California’s Proposed Location Privacy Act: A Potential Game-Changer for Tracking Location of Individuals
New York’s Health Information Privacy Act: what you need to know
Patient Privacy at Risk: The Hidden Flaws in Healthcare Data De-Identification (And How to Fix Them)
New privacy screen protectors launched to help practices stay HIPAA compliant
2024 Privacy, AI & Cybersecurity Year in Review

Share This Article