Forbes April 12, 2024
Rita Numerof

The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services is unfortunately, perhaps unintentionally, creating harm. Nowhere is this more evident than in the current arguments between the American Hospital Association and America’s Hospital Insurance Plans regarding site-neutral payments. The AHA strongly opposes site-neutral payment policies, arguing that the resulting reimbursement cuts would threaten patients’ access to care. On the flip side, AHIP argues that these policies are necessary to protect patients from excessive out-of-pocket costs without a corresponding increase in the quality of care.

The current ‘shouting match’ is dangerous. Both organizations’ arguments are grounded in the status quo and current payment model. And largely because of that, neither side should ‘win’–although both bring a perspective that needs to be heard. CMS...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, Insurance, Payer, Provider
Judge rejects J&J, Bristol Myers Squibb challenges to Medicare drug-price negotiations
STAT+: Biden administration boosts some Medicaid payments to match commercial rates
Discerning the Truth About the Medicare Advantage Controversy
Why the ACA health insurance exchange is the next reimbursement battle ground
What Prompted CMS To Change Course With Its Data Restrictions?

Share This Article