STAT January 29, 2024
Sarah Owermohle

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court will this March hear arguments centered on the government’s role in communicating — and sometimes censoring — pertinent public health information in the midst of a pandemic.

At the core of the lawsuit is whether the federal government’s requests for social media and search giants like Google, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to moderate Covid-19 misinformation violated users’ First Amendment rights.

While the suit was originally filed by then-Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt — and known as Missouri v. Biden — a range of plaintiffs arguing that the Biden administration suppressed their Covid-19 content later joined. Those include Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, who co-authored a paper, the Great Barrington Declaration, advancing the theory that people...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Public Health / COVID, Social Media, Technology
Listening to TikTok — Patient Voices, Bias, and the Medical Record
Trump's new tech era: AI, crypto, social media divide and deals galore
Why some physicians oppose the TikTok ban
Hospitals must fight misinformation, and see it as a threat to their business
Senior Living Operators Stick With Tried-and-True Social Media Strategies Despite Shifting Landscape

Share This Article