Politico September 3, 2024
Ruth Reader, Daniel Payne and Erin Schumaker

AROUND THE AGENCIES

Concern about FDA regulation of artificial intelligence tools used in medicine is growing among former agency officials and other medical specialists.

That’s the bad news. The good: Plenty of people have ideas about how to improve it.

The latest example of their concern is a review in Nature Medicine of 521 FDA-authorized AI medical devices. Forty-two percent lacked published clinical validation data, according to the researchers from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and other institutions.

That lack of rigor, they wrote, gets in the way of health systems that want to adopt the tools: “Patients and providers need a gold-standard indicator of efficacy and safety for medical AI devices.”

They called on the FDA...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), FDA, Govt Agencies, Regulations, Technology
FDA regulator examines AI's growing influence in cardiology
Opinion: STAT+: How the FDA and CMS worked together on a new approach to paying for digital mental health treatments
FDA Nod Paves Way for AstraZeneca Drug to Become New Standard of Care in Rare Blood Cancer
FDA's health kick: New food labels, banned food dyes, and more
FDA Releases Draft Guidance on Evaluating the Risk and Credibility of AI Used in Establishing Drug and Device Safety, Effectiveness, and Quality

Share This Article