Politico September 3, 2024
Ruth Reader, Daniel Payne and Erin Schumaker

AROUND THE AGENCIES

Concern about FDA regulation of artificial intelligence tools used in medicine is growing among former agency officials and other medical specialists.

That’s the bad news. The good: Plenty of people have ideas about how to improve it.

The latest example of their concern is a review in Nature Medicine of 521 FDA-authorized AI medical devices. Forty-two percent lacked published clinical validation data, according to the researchers from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and other institutions.

That lack of rigor, they wrote, gets in the way of health systems that want to adopt the tools: “Patients and providers need a gold-standard indicator of efficacy and safety for medical AI devices.”

They called on the FDA...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), FDA, Govt Agencies, Regulations, Technology
FDA struggles to retain inspectors: GAO
How Do You Construct a Safe, Effective Algorithm?
FDA Aligns with Pharmacists in Ensuring Integrity of Drug Supply Chain | ASPL 2024
STAT+: With GOP control of Congress, Trump has broad power to reshape health care
Inaugural Meeting for FDA's Digital Health Advisory Committee to Focus on GenAI-enabled Medical Devices

Share This Article