JAMA Network December 11, 2017
Ishani Ganguli, MD, MPH; Timothy G. Ferris, MD, MPH

In a time of uncertainty about the future of health care in the United States, at least 2 issues are clear. First, the current system is flawed—at times delivering both too much and too little care that is often fragmented, poorly communicated, and expensive. Second, the incentives in still-pervasive fee-for-service payment models are the basis for many of these problems. The current policy antidote, consisting of alternative payment models such as accountable care organizations (ACOs), builds on the failed managed care experiment of the 1990s, again relying on a budget for a defined population of patients but this time with checks on quality, unrestricted patient choice, and attenuated financial risk.1 Although early studies of the model show only modest success...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACO (Accountable Care), CMS, Health System / Hospital, Healthcare System, Medicaid, Medicare, Payer, Physician, Population Health Mgmt, Primary care
Home-Based Care Provider HarmonyCares Thrives In ACO REACH’s First Performance Year
NAACOS pushes ACO REACH extension after $1.54B in savings
CMS Reports on Performance Improvements by ACO REACH Participants
Palliative Care, ACO Collaborations Fuel ‘Historic Savings’ in MSSP Program
Providence's ACO saved Medicare $137M in 1 year — here's how

Share This Article