Health Affairs June 9, 2023
Sara Rosenbaum, Timothy Jost, MaryBeth Musumeci, Alexander Somodevilla

For over a half century, the United States Supreme Court has recognized that beneficiaries of public welfare programs can sue in federal court under a special provision of federal law, 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (section 1983), when state officials violate their rights. In Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County v Talevski, state officials challenged this enduring principle in a case involving the alleged violation of Gorgi Talevski’s federal rights under Medicaid’s Federal Nursing Home Reform Act (FNHRA). By a 7-2 margin, in a remarkable opinion for the Court authored by Justice Jackson and joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, the Court made short shrift of their claims. Talevski’s holding thus ensures the...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), Govt Agencies, Insurance, Medicaid, Patient / Consumer
What the Medicaid unwinding means for plans, providers, and more
New Federal Rules for Medicaid Advisory Committees and Beneficiary Advisory Councils
CMS Publishes Final Rule on Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)
CMS final rules to boost Medicaid, CHIP access and payment: 11 things to know
New federal rule establishes minimum staffing levels for nursing homes

Share This Article