Health Affairs June 1, 2018
Alexander B. Blum, Travis Broome, Sean Cavanaugh, Farzad Mostashari

Despite the growth of commercial gain-share—also known as Accountable Care Organization (ACO)—arrangements, a lack of consistent contract structures and terms has hampered the adoption of value-based care. This is particularly true for independent physicians, only 34 percent of whom enter commercial gain-share arrangements. National payers have unanimously voiced their goal to move towards value-based arrangements. To be successful, these efforts must engage the nearly one out of every three physicians who identify as an independent provider. This post proposes a principle-driven approach to align the incentives of payers and providers to facilitate greater adoption of new value-based payment models and to avoid common pitfalls in ACO contract negotiations.

Payer Value-Based Contracting Goals

The Affordable Care Act created the Medicare Shared...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACO (Accountable Care), CMS, Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, Insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Payer, Payment Models, Physician, Primary care, Provider, Self-insured, Value Based
Even modest meds adherence improvement can be financially transformative for health systems
CMS Moves Closer to Accountable Care Goals with 2025 ACO Initiatives
NAACOS Applauds Bipartisan House Bill on Value-Based Data Reporting
Late to APP Reporting? Untangle Your ACO’s Optimal Method
Medicare Accountable Care Organizations In 2023: Large Savings With Increasing Value-Based Programmatic Competition

Share This Article