Lexology April 27, 2023
Reed Smith LLP

In part I, we discussed whether federal district courts could exercise jurisdiction under the federal-question statute over legal challenges to overpayment determinations made by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) under the agency’s controversial Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) program for Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations. In part II, we discussed whether MA organizations must exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit under the federal-question statute.

In this final installment, we discuss a litigation nuance of potential significance in this unique context: namely, whether a district court may find that a MA organization can only challenge a RADV overpayment determination in the United States Court of Federal Claims.

Unlike in traditional Medicare, which uses provider and supplier participation agreements, the...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Medicare Advantage, Provider
Alignment Healthcare names new president as insurer eyes growth
Clover, Alignment grow Medicare Advantage enrollment
Supplemental Benefits Offer Few Advantages for MA Enrollees
Medicare Enrollment Trends in Four Charts
Medicare Advantage payments expected to rise in 2026, and doctors are dismayed

Share This Article