Lexology April 20, 2023
Reed Smith LLP

In part I, we discussed whether federal district courts could exercise jurisdiction under the federal-question statute over legal challenges to overpayment determinations made by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) under the agency’s controversial Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) program for Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations. After concluding that existing Supreme Court precedent provided a substantial basis for arguing in favor of such jurisdiction, we left for another day the antecedent question whether MA organizations must exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit under the federal-question statute.

The seemingly straightforward exhaustion question presents a host of considerations that belie a one-size-fits-all answer. The practical answer likely depends on the nature of the specific overpayment determination at issue and the grounds...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Medicare Advantage
Alignment Healthcare names new president as insurer eyes growth
Clover, Alignment grow Medicare Advantage enrollment
Supplemental Benefits Offer Few Advantages for MA Enrollees
Medicare Enrollment Trends in Four Charts
Medicare Advantage payments expected to rise in 2026, and doctors are dismayed

Share This Article