Lexology April 20, 2023
Reed Smith LLP

In part I, we discussed whether federal district courts could exercise jurisdiction under the federal-question statute over legal challenges to overpayment determinations made by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) under the agency’s controversial Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) program for Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations. After concluding that existing Supreme Court precedent provided a substantial basis for arguing in favor of such jurisdiction, we left for another day the antecedent question whether MA organizations must exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit under the federal-question statute.

The seemingly straightforward exhaustion question presents a host of considerations that belie a one-size-fits-all answer. The practical answer likely depends on the nature of the specific overpayment determination at issue and the grounds...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Medicare Advantage
‘Long-Term Harm’: Former CMS Chief Warns HHS Cuts Will Impact Nursing Home Surveys, MA Oversight
Senate report scrutinizes Medicare Advantage marketing spend, broker practices
Nursing Home Relief: Bipartisan Bill Aims to Reform Prior Auth Among Medicare Advantage Plans
Risk Adjustment Reform: Navigating Ideas And Tradeoffs (Part 2)
Provider-sponsored Medicare Advantage plan enrollment shrinks

Share This Article