CHQPR June 5, 2022
Harold D. Miller

The failure of current value-based payment programs to significantly reduce healthcare spending has resulted in proposals to (1) require providers to take “downside risk” for all of the services their patients receive, and (2) completely replace fee-for-service payments with “population-based payments.”

There is no evidence that requiring providers to take financial risk for the total cost of care or replacing fees with capitation will be more successful than shared savings models in controlling spending while maintaining quality. In fact, there is good reason to believe these types of programs would cause more problems than they solve because of five fundamental flaws in the ways such programs operate:

1. The budgets and spending targets that are used will always be wrong;

...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Insurance, Payment Models, Population Health Mgmt, Provider, Value Based
Late to APP Reporting? Untangle Your ACO’s Optimal Method
Improving CMS Financial Benchmarking: Lessons Learned By The Innovation Center
UnitedHealth Group CEO: Value-Based Care Could Offset Rising Provider, Drug Costs
FCA Enforcement in Value-Based Care Arrangements Heated Up in 2024 and Likely to Remain a Priority in 2025
Quality Pathway Implementation At The CMS Innovation Center

Share This Article