CHQPR June 5, 2022
Harold D. Miller

The failure of current value-based payment programs to significantly reduce healthcare spending has resulted in proposals to (1) require providers to take “downside risk” for all of the services their patients receive, and (2) completely replace fee-for-service payments with “population-based payments.”

There is no evidence that requiring providers to take financial risk for the total cost of care or replacing fees with capitation will be more successful than shared savings models in controlling spending while maintaining quality. In fact, there is good reason to believe these types of programs would cause more problems than they solve because of five fundamental flaws in the ways such programs operate:

1. The budgets and spending targets that are used will always be wrong;

...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Insurance, Payment Models, Population Health Mgmt, Provider, Value Based
Bundling Boomer Housing with On-site Primary Care and Wellness-Focused Living: It Just Makes Sense
SOFHA and Lumeris Partner to Enhance Value-Based Care in Tennessee and Virginia
Finalized 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule advances CCM and value-based care with new advanced primary care management codes
Value-based models picked up steam in 2023: 5 numbers to know
Home-Based Care Provider HarmonyCares Thrives In ACO REACH’s First Performance Year

Share This Article