Fierce Health Payers October 14, 2019
Robert King

Last week the Trump administration released two proposed rules to ensure that value-based care deals don’t run afoul of the Stark Law and the antikickback statute.

But while provider groups were largely optimistic about the direction of the new rules, there are still some areas that could cause compliance headaches.

Here’s a look at a few such concerns:

Documenting value-based care

A major requirement in both rules is creating a document outlining any value-based arrangement in order to get the safe harbor and exception.

The document must include the targeted patient population, value-based outcome and duration of the deal. Any compensation delivered from say a hospital to a doctor’s office as part of a value-based outcome cannot exceed fair market...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, HHS, Insurance, OIG, Payment Models, Physician, Primary care, Provider, Regulations, Value Based
The Difference Between a Law and a Regulation in Healthcare, Post-Chevron
Google, Meta execs blast Europe over strict AI regulation as Big Tech ups the ante
The Future of Regulatory Compliance Lies in AI-Powered Tech
AI Regulations: EU Withdraws AI Liability Proposal; US Seeks Comments on AI Action Plan
Europe risks becoming a 'museum' if it doesn't innovate in AI and deregulate, Swedish PM warns

Share This Article