CNBC December 18, 2019
Berkeley Lovelace Jr.,Tucker Higgins

KEY POINTS
  • A federal appeals court rules that the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate provision is unconstitutional but punts on deciding whether the rest of the landmark health-care law should be tossed out.
  • The court is ordering a lower court judge to reconsider whether ACA, more commonly known as Obamacare, should remain intact.

A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate provision is unconstitutional but punted on deciding whether the rest of the landmark health-care law should be tossed out.

The court, in a 2 to 1 decision, is also ordering a lower court judge to reconsider whether ACA, more commonly known as Obamacare, should remain intact.

...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), CMS, Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, HHS, Insurance, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Provider, Public Exchange, Regulations
Emerging Opportunities for State-Based Marketplaces (SBMs)
California's ACA marketplace, Google partner on AI-powered enrollment
HHS finalizes 340B dispute rule
Racial health disparities exist in every state, new report says
Advancing Racial Equity in U.S. Health Care

Share This Article