Forbes October 17, 2019
Howard Gleckman

In a new report, my Urban Institute colleagues have estimated that a full-blown Medicare for All plan would increase federal government healthcare spending by a net of $32 trillion over the next decade.

If you love the idea of a universal single-payer government health insurance program, you have to explain how you would finance it. And that means you must, in some way, confront a complex series of trade-offs—many inextricably tied up in the tax code.

In Tuesday night’s Democratic presidential debate, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) was asked repeatedly how she’d pay for Medicare for All. And each time she dodged the question.

A bank shot

Shifting from today’s mix of private and public health insurance to a...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Market Research, Medicare, Patient / Consumer, Provider, Regulations, Trends
CMMI’s Innovations in Behavioral Health: Promoting Physical and Mental Well-being
Medicare Stumbles Managing a Costly Problem — Chronic Illness
Inferred Risk: Reforming Medicare Risk Scores To Create A Fairer System
California, Oregon eye universal health coverage
Nearly 4 million Medicare patients with heart disease may be eligible for Wegovy coverage

Share This Article