Health Affairs November 26, 2019
Daniel P. O’Neill

Over the past year, the congressional debate over surprise billing has converged on two policy options to resolve out-of-network payments—1) a simple benchmark, in which a health plan pays out-of-network providers the median rate agreed with local in-network providers in the same specialty, or 2) a similar benchmark combined with optional arbitration if the provider or payer objects to that default amount. These reforms would dent staffing company and hospital revenues by only 0.75 percent to 1.00 percent over the next 10 years—while aggregate hospital and physician revenues rise by more than 60 percent, or $1.6 trillion—yet, the legislation has sparked a furious lobbying campaign to perpetuate the status quo. Meanwhile, the Sturm und Drang over arbitration has eclipsed discussion...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, Insurance, Patient / Consumer, Provider, RCM (Revenue Cycle Mgmt), Regulations
Embracing the 'Musical Chairs:' How One VP of Rev Cycle Prioritizes Succession Planning
Remain Compliant – and Take the Money
The AI Blueprint: An Implementation Guide for Revenue Cycle Leaders
Tower Health says Ensemble Health Partners will take over billing, patient access management
BHB VALUE: Tackling Staffing and Reimbursement Challenges: The Role of AI-powered Automation in Successful Revenue Cycle Management

Share This Article