Chief Healthcare Executive July 1, 2022
Ron Southwick

The American Medical Association said the court’s decision improperly curbs efforts to fight climate change and harms the public. More broadly, some suggest it could limit the scope of all federal agencies.

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling that critics say improperly limits the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to fight climate change and could harm public health.

Some analysts also say the ruling could potentially set a precedent to restrict the authority of the federal government, including healthcare agencies.

With a 6-3 ruling in West Virginia v. EPA, the court said Thursday the agency lacks the authority to utilize the Clean Air Act to enforce limits on greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, a major contributor to climate change.

...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Public Health / COVID
U.S. expands testing for bird flu in dairy cows
Bridging Public Health and Social Movements
Watch: What we know about traces of H5N1 bird flu found in pasteurized milk
A Bird Flu H5N1 Status Report
Hepatitis Kills 3500 People Each Day, Says WHO

Share This Article