Healthcare Economist April 12, 2021
Jason Shafrin

If you want to implement value-based care, you need to define what a ‘good’ outcome is. A good outcome may be different for different individuals. For instance, if you look at mortality rates for a given disease, it makes sense that individuals age 80 and above will have higher mortality rates than those 20-29 year old with the identical condition. If you are measuring physician or hospital quality, you will want to control–or “risk-adjust”–for these differences in patient characteristics. Traditionally, risk adjustment controls for patient demographics and medical conditions. However, should you control for social factors such as poverty or education? There is a lot of debate:

The current policy of the National Quality Forum (NQF) allows adjustment for...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Equity/SDOH, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Insurance, Patient / Consumer, Payment Models, Provider, Value Based
Charted: Health (in)equity in the United States
Los Angeles is using AI in a pilot program to try to predict homelessness and allocate aid
Study: Disparities in access to in-network behavioral health care pervasive
Health disparities across states: 6 new findings
Racial health disparities exist in every state, new report says

Share This Article