KFF Health News January 27, 2020
Drew Altman, Kaiser Family Foundation

Conventional wisdom holds that big, self-insured companies do a better job controlling health care costs than firms that rely entirely on insurance companies to provide their workers’ coverage. But that’s not true.

Why it matters: Although a handful of big self-insured companies get a lot of attention for their cost-control efforts, the data tell a different story: Self-insured and fully insured companies are equally bad at controlling health care costs.

By the numbers: The average family premium for fully insured firms last year was a whopping $20,627.

  • For larger self-insured firms, it was $20,739.
  • There hasn’t been a meaningful difference for the past 20 years.

Self-insured firms would seem to have an advantage because...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Employer, Insurance, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Pricing / Spending, Provider, Self-insured
'Podnosis': Inside Morgan Health's investment strategy and the art of the pitch
Q&A: Brittany Cunningham on Vanderbilt’s MyHealth Bundles Program
Is there ever going to be an alternative to employer-sponsored healthcare?
More Risks, More Opportunities: What’s Next For Employers In Healthcare?
HHS Aligns Part 2 Rules with the HIPAA Privacy Rules Effects on Self Insured Plan Sponsors

Share This Article