STAT December 26, 2019
Richard Ghalie

When a process works, it’s natural to try to repeat it rather than recreate or rethink it. This holds true in running clinical trials to develop new drugs: the main path to FDA drug approval is often the same path that led to the prior drug’s approval.

For decades, the foundational basis for determining if a drug should be approved is whether its benefits outweigh its known and potential risks for the intended population. At its core, this is a quantitative risk-benefit analysis. It is not a patient-centric evaluation and it does not emphasize individual patient quality of life as a significant factor.

It’s time to start shifting this strategy and instead approach drug development not only through balancing efficacy...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: FDA, Govt Agencies, Patient / Consumer, Pharma, Technology
Former Bristol Myers CEO tapped as Novartis’ next board chair
The Power of Drug Discovery with Philip Tagari
Novartis raises forecasts as top drug sales beat Wall Street estimates
Pharma Pulse 4/23/24: Drug Discount Programs Poised to Change with New Tech, SpecialtyRx Savings Navigator to Enhance Affordability & more
Boehringer Ingelheim Strikes Regenerative Med R&D Deal Spanning MASH & More Liver Diseases

Share This Article