Health Affairs January 16, 2020
Nathan Hodson

The Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) individual shared responsibility penalty was reduced to $0 in 2017, effectively repealing the individual mandate and removing a key means of reducing uninsurance. For those who want to reduce uninsurance, auto-enrollment may be a feasible alternative. Overcoming some of the administrative challenges of previous proposals, Brookings Fellow Christen Linke Young’s retroactive model offers new hope for auto-enrollment into health insurance. However, Young’s approach risks exacerbating certain behavioral biases with perverse outcomes for enrollees.

Auto-enrollment is a kind of “nudge,” building on the behavioral bias toward inertia. But the very bias that makes auto-enrollment powerful also presents challenges for policy makers. People who are auto-enrolled may underuse their entitlement and may remain enrolled in an...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), CMS, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Provider, Public Exchange
Racial health disparities exist in every state, new report says
Advancing Racial Equity in U.S. Health Care
HHS finalizes rule on 340B Administrative Dispute Resolution process
Mississippi weighs state-based ACA exchange
What to Expect on Healthcare from a Second Trump Presidency

Share This Article