Medscape October 17, 2019
Kerry Dooley Young

A new report offers estimates on eight potential paths for expanding access to healthcare in the United States. It shows how a Medicare-for-all approach could either be the most expensive or the cheapest option.

With a “single-payer lite” approach, national health spending would theoretically be cut by almost $210 billion in 2020, to $3.29 trillion, according to the report, which was prepared by researchers at the nonprofit, left-leaning Urban Institute. The Commonwealth Fund, which supported this work, released the report on Wednesday.

The single-payer-lite approach was the least costly with respect to total national health spending. However, it would raise expenses for the federal government. Under the single-payer-lite approach, the federal government’s share of the nation’s medical bills would rise...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Insurance, Medicare, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Provider, Trends
Elevance Health sees double-digit profit growth in Q1, posting $2.2 B in earnings
Elevance Health posts $2.2B profit in Q1
Patient advocates shred Becerra's copay accumulator comments
Racial health disparities exist in every state, new report says
Elevance Health Boosts Behavioral Health Biz with $740M State Contracts

Share This Article