Health Affairs October 31, 2018
Amol S. Navathe, Joshua M. Liao

Launched in 2017 to reward high-value clinicians with upward reimbursement adjustments and penalize low-value clinicians with downward adjustments, the nationwide Medicare Quality Payment Program(QPP) consists of two potential participation tracks: the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and the Advanced Alternative Payment Model (AAPM). In recent posts, we detailed how strong performance in the MIPS track may not lead to the frequently referenced maximum reimbursement increases (for example, ±4 percent in 2017 and ±5 percent in 2018) and implications for clinicians. Instead, actual increases could potentially exceed or fall below those amounts due to how Medicare funds adjustments and how clinicians’ performance relative to others impacts their MIPS scoring.

A related and equally important issue for clinicians is to understand...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, Insurance, MACRA, Medicare, Payment Models, Physician, Primary care, Provider, RCM (Revenue Cycle Mgmt), Value Based
Radiologists at a clear disadvantage in Medicare’s MIPS program, new study shows
Knowing the Score: MIPS
Reminder: MIPS 2023 Data Submission is Open
MIPS success: What specialists need to know
How specialty practices can succeed in MIPS and value-based care

Share This Article