Forbes September 13, 2020
Aayushi Pratap

Two years ago, the news of the birth of twins in China whose embryonic DNA were modified by a scientist to prevent HIV infection, snowballed a worldwide discourse around the ethics of using DNA modifying technologies. Many governments rushed to legislate prohibitions on germline gene editing, which involve genetic changes that can be passed onto future generations, while still allowing for applications that can treat a specific disease within an individual. But it wasn’t until earlier this month that an international consortium released new guidelines on how to proceed.

The stakes were high, since Crispr, which can target and cut sections of DNA like a pair of molecular scissors, has myriad applications for medicines and other advancements. The International...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Biotechnology, Pharma / Biotech, Precision Medicine
Cullinan Nets $280M Investment and Targets CD19 in Lupus
Eli Lilly Shows Obesity Drug Zepbound Can Treat Sleep Apnea Too
Fierce Biotech Layoff Tracker 2024: Ultimovacs says goodbye to 40% of staff; Major pharmas turn to layoffs
Lilly's Prevail walks away from Precision gene editing collab
Eli Lilly's tirzepatide scores again, this time in 2 sleep apnea trials

Share This Article