Lexology July 12, 2019
Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP

In a reversal of previous Obama Administration guidance, the Trump Administration recently finalized regulationsthat provide for a new type of health reimbursement arrangement—the individual coverage HRA. In a previous blog, we briefly discussed the potential for the individual coverage HRA to provide large employers who are subject to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) employer coverage mandate with a cost-effective alternative for meeting those requirements. To recap, under the ACA, large employers (those with 50 or more full-time employees) must offer full-time employees ACA-compliant coverage or face potential penalties. Under current rules, simply offering an HRA without also offering more traditional group health plan coverage would not satisfy those requirements.

The new regulations change that result. If the HRA meets certain...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), CMS, Congress / White House, Employer, Govt Agencies, HHS, Insurance, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Provider, Public Exchange, Regulations
When your company's newest board member is an AI
Will noncompete clauses soon be illegal? The FTC is about to vote on it
Noncompetes cost workers $300B each year
Why the Commonwealth Fund Created a Task Force for Employer-Sponsored Insurance
FTC to vote on banning noncompete clauses

Share This Article