Lexology July 1, 2022
Mayer Brown

The United States Supreme Court recently issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org., ––– U.S. –––, 2022 WL 2276808 (2022), overturning Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). In holding that the U.S. Constitution does not protect a right to abortion, the court “returned” regulating abortion to the individual states. Aside from the obvious systematic implications of the decision, Dobbs has now created various challenges for pharmaceutical retailers and their ability to comply with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) privacy requirements.

Key Considerations for Pharmaceutical Retailers and Beyond

HIPAA is a comprehensive federal law that created national standards to prevent certain health information...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, HHS, HIPAA, Patient / Consumer, Privacy / Security, Provider, Regulations
Protecting Health Data Without Harming Patients: Overcoming the Barriers That Limit Our Access to Our Personal Health Information
If data is the new oil, there’s going to be war over it
Epic cuts data access to startup over alleged misuse
Health records giant Epic cracks down on startup for unauthorized sharing of patient data
2023 in Review: The Rise of Healthcare Data Privacy Regulations

Share This Article