Health Affairs October 31, 2024
Sara Rosenbaum

On December 4, 2024, the US Supreme Court will hear United States v Skrmetti. The case raises the question of whether a state law that prohibits medically necessary gender-affirming care for transgender people violates the 14th Amendment’s equal protection guarantee, which bars discrimination based on sex.

Skrmetti arrives five years after Bostock v Clayton County, Georgia, which addressed Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (the act). The act, among other prohibitions, bars employment discrimination based on “sex.” Bostock held that the act’s prohibition on sex-based discrimination prohibits discriminatory conduct based on transgender identity or sexual orientation. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which oversees and enforces Title VII, has extended Bostock’s holding to the terms and conditions of employment...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Insurance, Patient / Consumer
Consumers who delayed choosing health insurance cite concerns with Trump administration: survey
Massachusetts clears path for foreign physicians to practice: 5 things to know
Another State Faces The Pros, Cons Of Standardizing Home Care
Diversity data in the US: Understanding the FDA’s push for more representation in clinical trials
PBMs Challenge FTC Enforcement Authority In Federal Court

Share This Article