AXIOS October 16, 2019
Caitlin Owens

Democrats aren’t debating small differences in health policy — a public option would be radically different than a shift to a single payer system, and a new analysis by the Urban Institute and the Commonwealth Fund illustrates just how big those differences are.

By the numbers: A public option — even a robust one — would cost the federal government an additional $1.5 trillion over 10 years. Full-blown single payer would result in a federal spending...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Provider, Regulations
Patient advocates shred Becerra's copay accumulator comments
Opinion: Former HHS secretaries: Congress should adopt site-neutral payments for health care
One Year into the Biden Administration's Care Executive Order
Proposed Federal AI Oversight Plan Faces Hurdles, Experts Say
Bill Proposes Enabling Same-Day Access to Physical and Mental Health Care for Kids on Medicaid

Share This Article