Lexology December 1, 2022
Reed Smith LLP

Two weeks ago, we decried the pattern that some courts follow in allowing shifting slates of boilerplate allegations to cases to discovery. The decision in Corrigan v. Covidien LP, No. 22-cv-10220, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210296 (D. Mass. Nov. 21, 2022), reminded us of another of our post-TwIqbal pet peeves: when courts treat sweeping legal conclusions as if they were plausible factual assertions. The basic allegations in Corrigan were that the plaintiff’s surgeon used defendant’s surgical stapler to perform an anastomosis—reattachment of two parts of the digestive tract—in connection with removing part of his sigmoid colon (for unspecified reasons, but often diverticulitis or cancer) and the anastomosis later leaked, leading to further surgical intervention. As we said two weeks ago,...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: FDA, Govt Agencies
Opinion: STAT+: How AI can help satisfy FDA’s drug, device diversity requirements
FDA wants to boost trial innovation with new center at CDER
Stelara biosimilar from Alvotech, Teva approved by FDA
Scopio Labs Receives FDA Clearance For AI-Driven Bone Marrow Analysis Application
STAT+: Grocers are pushing legislation they claim would enhance food safety. Advocates say it would gut FDA rules

Share This Article