CHQPR June 5, 2022
Harold D. Miller

The failure of current value-based payment programs to significantly reduce healthcare spending has resulted in proposals to (1) require providers to take “downside risk” for all of the services their patients receive, and (2) completely replace fee-for-service payments with “population-based payments.”

There is no evidence that requiring providers to take financial risk for the total cost of care or replacing fees with capitation will be more successful than shared savings models in controlling spending while maintaining quality. In fact, there is good reason to believe these types of programs would cause more problems than they solve because of five fundamental flaws in the ways such programs operate:

1. The budgets and spending targets that are used will always be wrong;

...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Insurance, Payment Models, Population Health Mgmt, Provider, Value Based
Ilant Health Raises Extended Seed Round of $5.5M for Obesity Management Platform
Physician-led ACOs are the most effective at reducing care costs: report
CVS, inVio creating South Carolina ACO through REACH
‘Capital Will Follow Where There’s Predictability’: Ideal Option CEO Connects Value-Based Care and Enterprise Value
Value-based care adoption is a journey, not a destination. And the map you follow can make all the difference

Share This Article